A board divided; Special meeting recessed to August 28 at 6:30 pm

SPECIAL MEETING of the Clawson Public Schools Board of Education recessed until Friday, August 28th at 6:30 p.m. in the Clawson High School Media Center

A special meeting of the Clawson Public Schools Board of Education was held on Monday, August 24, 2015 at 6:30 pm with a local police department presence.  To the surprise of many, the Board allowed a public forum.  Many community members, custodians, school staff members and parents spoke expressing concerns for the way current CPS custodians are being treated by the District (layoff notices were issued via email to custodians on Monday, August 24, 2015), safety and quality concerns with GCA Services, demanded the Board to serve its public who elected them into office and act in accordance to the public’s desires and wishes, which was to NOT outsource the CPS custodians, pointed out that Member Kevin Turner enrolls his children in Royal Oak Public Schools, not CPS in the District in which he lives and is supposed to serve, and, finally, some expressed disappointment with the Board of Education, as a whole.

A statement was then read by Kevin Turner explaining that this special meeting was being held due to the Board potentially violating the Open Meetings Act because of the failure to post the notice or agenda to their August 10th meeting (although, it was a regularly scheduled meeting, in which public attendees were present, the meeting notice and agenda are required, by law, to be timely posted).  Mr. Turner then read a proposed Resolution, which was prepared by their legal counsel, which stated that the Board was “ratifying” their votes cast at the meeting held on August 10th.  President Jessica Back asked for any discussion among the members.

Member Kimmi Carlesimo raised concern with the Resolution stating that the Resolution read by Mr. Turner was different than the Resolution distributed to Board Members for their review and consideration the evening prior.  The specific wording was changed from “reenacting” the Board’s August 10th meeting to “ratifying” the entire meeting, including the votes cast that night.  It was questioned as to why this word was changed throughout the proposed Resolution, who changed it and why the Board, as a whole, was not involved in a discussion and determination to do this.  No direct answers to these questions were provided.

A second issue of Open Meetings Act compliance was raised by Member Andrea Hodges with regard to the lack of posting an agenda for last evening’s meeting in a timely manner.  When quoting from the CPS Board of Education Bylaws the policy for such timely postings of meeting announcements and agendas, President Jessica Back remarked she was “confused” and asked for a citation of the section of Bylaws the policy was from.  Mrs. Hodges provided that cite.  Discussion continued regarding the difference between the posting of an “agenda” and the posting of the “announcement” of a meeting (special meetings require an agenda to be posted 24 hours prior to meeting date and time and the official announcement posted 18 hours prior).

Mrs. Hodges motioned to to recess the meeting for 36 hours to provide the public with ample notice of the meeting and suggested that the Board begin to work together to insure its meetings were held in compliance with its own policies and in abidance of the law [Open Meetings Act].  Discussion was had amongst Board Members and the motion was amended to include the meeting date and time of Friday, August 28, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. to resume the special meeting.  Mrs. Carlesimo supported the motion, which was approved by a 6-1 vote.  Mr. Turner was the only Member to vote to NOT uphold the requirements of the law.  Mr. Kevin Sheridan requested consultation be made with the Board’s attorneys to determine whether or not they will have to “reenact” their August 10th meeting or whether they can simply “ratify” or “reaffirm” it.

The Board then recessed its August 24th meeting until Friday, August 28, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. in the Clawson High School media center.  Following the meeting, as everyone departed, Mr. Turner left the building with police protection and no explanation for same.

The outcome of this meeting is crucial to the safety of our children, the state of our schools, the financial status of our schools (note past pieces of research indicating increasing outsourcing costs following initial contracts, the fact that CPS is required to purchase all new custodial equipment at a cost unknown to the Board, and the high probability of costs being passed on to any and all extracurricular and parent-teacher groups for custodial services at their events).

The Board of Education Members’ emails are always available.  Use this means of communication and contact them immediately to express your concerns, ask your questions, state facts and experiences you, friends or family have with the outsourcing of school custodial services, and tell them to reconsider their decision to bring strangers into our kids’ schools!

http://www.clawsonschools.org/downloads/board_of_education/board_members_for_2015_calendar_year.pdf

School district ends privatization and returns to hired custodial employees

“One example of this is Egg Harbor Township which, years back, voted to privatize their custodial services – only to end that privatization a year later and go back to hiring their own custodial employees. They incurred a huge expense in replacing equipment that was missing or damaged by the subcontracted custodians.”

Shore News Today. (2015, July 1). School union protests subcontracting Greater Egg lawn and cleaning services. Retrieved from http://www.shorenewstoday.com/galloway_township/school-union-protests-subcontracting-greater-egg-lawn-and-cleaning-services/article_71dcdd82-1ff0-11e5-9318-377641df5ba9.html

“School custodians rehired after privatization fails”

“Filthy floors. Unsanitary bathrooms. Strangers in the hallways. These were everyday conditions at schools in the Upper Freehold Regional School District in Allentown, N.J.. The culprit? Privatization”

[…]

“It wasn’t always like that. The district’s custodial services were once performed by UFREA members who were well-trained, lived and voted in the community, and enjoyed working with students.”

Rosales, J. (2010, Sept. 8). School custodians rehired after privatization fails. neaToday. Retrieved from http://neatoday.org/2010/09/08/school-custodians-rehired-after-privatization-fails/

“Privatized custodial services=filthy school”

“The $340 million privatization of the district’s custodial services has led to filthier buildings and fewer custodians, while forcing principals to take time away from instruction to make sure that their school is clean.”

Ravitch, D. (2014, Sept. 14). Chicago: Privatized custodial services=filthy school. [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://dianeravitch.net/2014/09/14/chicago-privatized-custodial-servicesfilthy-schools/

“Privatization: Selling America to the Lowest Bidder”

“Several years ago the Bethel Park School District in Pennsylvania voted to contract with ServiceMaster, a $1.5 billion multinational corporation, to provide custodial services to city schools. The School Board took this step because it believed it would save money. […] By the time the ServiceMaster contract was up for renewal, Bethel Park had discovered the real costs of contracting out: dirty schools, destroyed equipment, and low morale among poorly-paid workers. The school district dropped the contract, having learned the hard way that contracting with a profit-making corporation raises costs while weakening public control over service delivery.” (p. 1)

“Cost savings are often illusory; quality of service declines; corruption takes root; the disadvantaged are further isolated; and in a most fundamental way, the very democratic nature of our public services is sacrificed to the marketplace.” (p. 2)

Hidden Costs of Privatizing
Administrative costs:

Cost overruns: Frequently a contractor will “low-ball” or underbid to receive a new contract, in anticipation of raising its rates once it has become established. (p. 3)

Contractors Pad Contracts to Ensure Profits: Contractors who submit artificially low bids to gain a contract often make up the difference by adding certain prerequisites to their contracts.

Negative Impact on Communities: Contracting with private companies is nothing more than shifting from workers and community members to big contractors. The local economy loses. (p. 4)

Quality of Service Declines

“[…] evidence from hundreds of communities that the quality of service suffers at the hands of contractors who hire inexperienced transient personnel at low wages, skimp on contract requirements, and provide inadequate supervision.” (p. 5)

“Public administration is essential to public services. It’s integral to our system of checks and balances. Whereas privatization relies on the motives of private gain, democracy depends on the capacity to assert collective interests over those of the few. […] It is through our public programs and services that we are bound together as a society, each citizen with a responsibility to others.” (p. 8)

Bilik, A. (1990) Privatization: Selling America to the Lowest Bidder, Labor Research Review, 1(15). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1143&context=lrr

School cleanliness after outsourcing jobs

“Employees from across the district have complained about cockroaches and trash left for several days, said Laura Cloer, the president of Volusia Educational Support Association. She said her administrators’ requests for Aramark to clean the campus more thoroughly haven’t been granted.”

Martin, A. (2014, June 2). After outsourcing jobs, Volusia reviews school cleanliness. The Daytona Beach News-Journal. Retrieved from http://www.news-journalonline.com/article/20140602/NEWS/140609917

“[GCA] placed workers with criminal backgrounds in schools”

“[…] company’s record of placing workers with criminal backgrounds in schools – including drug and sex offenders.”

““The employee had passed a background check because he used an alias, according to Bernie Decker, GCA vice president of human resources. Since that time, the company has implemented a number of security measure that “will go a long way” toward preventing that type of fraud from occurring again, Decker said.”

“The company now, by law, uses fingerprinting and Social Security number checks in establishing an individual’s identity, according to Decker. “You have to understand, we hire a lot of people,” he said. “I think a couple of incidents with 20,000 employees is a pretty good batting record.””

Switzer, L. (2010, June 6). Hiring issues in janitor service’s past: District to use Tennessee company, even though it placed workers with criminal backgrounds in schools. The Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.bgdailynews.com/news/hiring-issues-in-janitor-service-s-past/article_39ed5c0a-c9d7-5462-b9bc-f5b7b4a8c16f.html

“Contracted employee arrested for stealing at […] school”

“[…] according to court documents, a GCA employee was arrested in September for stealing a projector belonging to Providence Middle School.”

“Curtis Whitted was charged and found guilty of petit larceny. He was sentenced to 12 months behind bars with 11 months suspended.”

Rarrick, C. (2014, Oct. 30). Contracted employee arrested for stealing at Chesterfield school. WTVR. Retrieved from http://wtvr.com/2014/10/30/contracted-employee-arrested-for-stealing-at-chesterfield-school/

“[GCA] school custodian sentenced for spying on girls”

“A former Brentwood elementary school janitor whose arrest for spying on girls in a bathroom sparked concerns over security has been sentenced to three and a half years in prison, a Williamson County Sheriff’s Office news release said.”

“Alvarado, who had worked for two years at the school, was employed by an Ohio contractor hired by the county.

While the company, GCA Services Group, and Williamson County Schools said at the time that Alvarado had been properly vetted, the accusations raised questions about why the district hired the firm, which had faced scrutiny in the past over how well it screened employees.”

Cowan, J. (2015, June 16). Ex-Brentwood school custodian sentenced for spying on girls. The Tennessean. Retrieved from http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/williamson/brentwood/2015/06/16/brentwood-school-custodian/28828193/

“Problems reported with outsourced custodial services…”

“Principals have noticed doors left unlocked and lights left on overnight, a lack of consistency in cleaning standards, high turnover and inadequate staffing. In one case, a woman who doesn’t work for the service recently returned a full set of school keys to Lloyd C. Bird High School because she said the custodian had been “thrown in jail.””

““The restrooms are becoming a health hazard. There is ‘gunk’ (for lack of a better word) on the fixtures, in the sinks and toilets, and on the floors,” according to a written review of the service at her school by L.C. Bird Principal Laura Hebert. “There are not enough custodians during the day to keep up with the normal wear and tear on the building in addition to any unforeseen issues that arise.”

“During Tuesday’s School Board budget workshop, Hebert told the board that three custodians called out of work Tuesday evening and no substitutes were sent to replace them. Hebert and other administrators said the custodians are responsive to issues once they are pointed out.”

Ramsey, J. (2015, Feb. 3). Problems reported with outsourced custodial services in Chesterfield schools. Richmond Times-Dispatch. Retrieved from http://www.richmond.com/news/article_9f431b7f-e826-563b-8dfd-124438aec487.html